Two regulations landed on the same factories. Nothing was built for that.

Most of the compliance tooling available to an Indian exporter was built for a European or American company, reporting on European or American assumptions about how plant data is kept. That's a bad fit here — a lot of the data that determines your CBAM or CCTS number sits in a Tally ledger, a diesel invoice, or a state electricity board bill, not in a system with an API.

At the same time, these two regulations are not the same problem wearing two names. CBAM is about what you export and what your upstream suppliers embedded in what they sold you. CCTS is a domestic obligation tied to your own energy consumption, with no relationship to whether you export anything at all. A manufacturer carrying both needs one accurate data pipeline that produces two different, correct answers — not two separate tools that quietly disagree with each other.

That's the infrastructure we think India's manufacturers need: something built around how Indian plants actually keep data, that treats both regulations as first-class rather than bolting one on as an afterthought, and that gives an auditor or verifier something better to check than a spreadsheet export.