Know what your plant owes, before your verifier asks.

One pipeline, four states, no shortcuts.

1. 01

   Plant data in

   Production volumes, fuel, purchased electricity, supplier declarations. CSV and Excel, a Tally or SAP connector, or AI extraction straight off invoices and utility bills.

2. 02

   Calculated once, under two methodologies

   The same data set produces a CBAM embedded-emissions figure and a CCTS emission-intensity figure, each under the right method for your sector.

3. 03

   Evidenced

   Every figure keeps a path back to the invoice, meter reading or ledger line it came from, hash-chained so a change cannot be made quietly.

4. 04

   Verified, then filed

   Your accredited agency's verification is recorded against the cycle — scoped to them, closed to your own staff — and Form B renders from what they recorded. Your auditor gets read-only access to the whole chain rather than a folder of exports and a series of emails.

This is what the EU assumes you emit.

Default values are set above the real global average on purpose — they are what applies when nobody has proved otherwise. Every tonne you ship under a default instead of your own verified figure is priced as though it came from a worse plant than yours.

The definitive phase is not a future problem.

It started in January 2026. Certificates for emissions embedded in your 2026 shipments are declared and surrendered in September 2027 — which means the data you are recording now is the data you will have to defend.

Two obligations, and plenty of plants carry both.

Compliance is the entry point, not the whole idea.

India is standing up a carbon market, and measurement is the part everything else rests on. A credit nobody can audit is worth nothing; a filing nobody can trace gets rejected. We are building the measurement layer — one verified record of what a plant actually emitted, good enough to file against, to issue credits from, and to defend to a third party.

• Comply

  Measure Scope 1, Scope 2 and embedded emissions from plant data. Out comes your CBAM report in the shape the EU expects, your CCTS position against your BEE target, and the evidence chain behind both.

  Shipped

• Account for the credits

  Beat your CCTS intensity target and the surplus is worth something. Carbon Credit Certificates tracked projected → issued → held → traded → retired, against the calculation that produced them.

  Shipped

• Trade them

  Settlement runs through a registered broker on a recognised exchange, behind an abstraction the platform already has — so a broker relationship plugs in rather than being retrofitted through the calculation layer.

  Roadmap

• Measure what isn't a factory

  The same MRV spine applied to offset projects — biogas, agroforestry, paddy methane — where measurement is distributed instead of metered, and built against BEE's own offset methodologies rather than a generic carbon-accounting model.

  Roadmap